The Supreme Court of India has upheld unique asymmetry in India's federalism by intricately balancing centralized authority and regional autonomy. Discuss with the help of relevant case laws. (Answer in 150 words)
Introduction
21 words
Main Body
Unique Asymmetry → Centre has more power not and in any Constitution. Entire Sovereignty & Judicial Sovereignty (Emergency division-Part VIII)
Balancing Centralized Authority
Upheld Emergency Provisions: cy constitutional and within legitimate power of Union (Minerva Mills Case)
Promoted Union Supremacy: by ensuring higher powers of Centre upheld.
Balancing Regional Autonomy
Upheld decentralization approach in states under power) Centre (Emergency division-Part VIII)
Promoted Union Supremacy: by ensuring higher powers of Centre upheld.
— ADITYA MATHOR
- Clear identification of key cases
- Structured discussion of balancing mechanisms
- References constitutional provisions
ADITYA MATHOR
Functions & Responsibilities of the Union and the States
Issues & Challenges Pertaining to the Federal Structure
Federalism and Centre-State Relations
96
Total words
3
Paragraphs
Formal and analytical
Tone