AB

Anshul BhattAIR 22

Question 10GS1GS1

Discuss India's efforts to internationalize education and its implications for cultural exchange and development.

Open scan (p.23)

Introduction

India has a rich culture in internationalization of education. India was the knowledge capital and Vishwa Guru.

17 words

Main Body

India has a rich culture in internationalization of education. India was the knowledge capital and Vishwa Guru. Scholars used to come from far off places to study in Nalanda and Taxila and Vikramshila, Odantipuri universities.

But in recent years we are seeing downturn in higher education quality (QS World Ranking) and brain drain. To avert this UGC has allowed 'internationalization of education' allow universities to set up campus in India.

Impasse on Society and fosters cultural exchange

Allowing new ideas and pedagogy from foreign universities.

Be would lead to downstream migration for higher education,

Would increase foreign students in India.

Would lead to diffusion of ideas.

Might lead to social disengagement of tradition and modernity by HSBTIA+ issue, live in relationships etc.

foreign universities would also get impacted by Indian ideas and boluace.

Would help in skilling guodim to international standard or marco Indian policy ready for global opportun.

It must be made sure that all procudural safeguards are followed and students get same quality education they would get in a foreign campus at affordabie price.

This step will go a long way in internationalizing ed. and foster cultu after.

— Anshul Bhatt · AIR 22

197 words10 paragraphs

Conclusion

It must be made sure that all procedural safeguards are followed and students get same quality education they would get in a foreign campus at affordable price. This step will go a long way in internationalizing ed. and fostering cultural exchange.

41 words

  • Historical context showing India's past educational excellence
  • Identifies current challenges (brain drain, quality)
  • Links historical tradition with modern solutions
  • Mentions specific ancient universities
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

Anshul Bhatt

AIR 22

Subject & Paper

GS1GS1

Topic

Salient aspects of Indian Society, Education and Internationalization

Internationalization of Education

Writing Stats

255

Total words

10

Paragraphs

Linked PYQ

5. Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow : 10x5=50 The complexity of a culture is to be found not only in its variable processes and their social definitions—traditions, institutions and formations—but also in the dynamic interrelations, at every point in the process, of historically varied and variable elements. In what I have called 'epochal' analysis, a cultural process is seized as a cultural system, with determinate dominant features : feudal culture or bourgeois culture or a transition from one to the other. This emphasis on dominant and definitive lineaments and features is important and often, in practice, effective. But it then often happens that its methodology is preserved for the very different function of historical analysis, in which a sense of movement within what is ordinarily abstracted as a system is crucially necessary, especially if it is to connect with the future as well as with the past. In authentic historical analysis, it is necessary at every point to recognize the complex interrelations between movements and tendencies both within and beyond a specific and effective dominance. It is necessary to examine how these relate to the whole cultural process rather than only to the selected and abstracted dominant system. Thus 'bourgeois culture' is a significant generalizing description and hypothesis, expressed within epochal analysis by fundamental comparisons with 'feudal culture' or 'socialist culture'. However, as a description of cultural process, over four or five centuries and in scores of different societies, it requires immediate historical and internally comparative differentiation. Moreover, even if this is acknowledged or practically carried out, the 'epochal' definition can exert its pressure as a static type against which all real cultural process is measured, either to show 'stages' or 'variations' of the type (which is still historical analysis) or, at its worst, to select supporting and exclude 'marginal' or 'incidental' or 'secondary' evidence. Such errors are avoidable if, while retaining the epochal hypothesis, we can find terms which recognize not only 'stages' and 'Variations' but the internal dynamic relations of any actual process. We have certainly still to speak of the 'dominant' and the 'effective', and in these senses of the hegemonic. But we find that we have also to speak, and indeed with further differentiation of each, of the 'residual' and the 'emergent' which in any real process, and at any moment in the process, are significant both in themselves and in what they reveal of the characteristics of the 'dominant'. (a) What does the epochal analysis usually take into account? (b) What has traditionally been the treatment of cultures in relation to the culture? (c) What should be the ideal way to study the historical processes of cultural formation? (d) Explain the viewpoint of the author towards cultural study at a given point in history. (e) Bring out the relation between dominant, residual and emergent cultures.

50M2014Read the following passage