KP

Komal PuniaAIR 6

Question Q.4Critically analyseGS1GS1

Critically analyse the efficacy of linguistic reorganization of states in addressing the reasons for linguistic divides in post-independent India.

Open scan (p.9)

Introduction

Linguistic provinces demand acceptance in Nehru report 1928 by congress had far reaching consequences on post-independent India.

17 words

Main Body

Linguistic reorganization demand:

demand of separation of Omdian, separate Bombay for Gujarati, Equatorial languages Punjabi speaking states.

Efficacy of reorganisation attempts in addressing the reasons for divides:

① Reduced regionalistic conflicts —

② Separation of Maharashtra & Gujarat - both regions prospered.

③ provided self-determination to people.

④ resulted in equitable development of regions.

⑤ better political empowerment of people eg jaj of Patti Ramaelu. However, vested interests still threaten security.

demand for Vidharsha, issues at Srilankan, Tamil & Bengal in Engaland.

Linguistic reorganisation on recommendation of Patel dhi Commission did not accepted one language one state formula rather tried to balance administrative & cultural others.

— Komal Punia · AIR 6

106 words8 paragraphs

Conclusion

all these causes contributed to weakening of NCM. Despite that it resitted in democratic awakening among masses and prepared ground for future struggles.

23 words

  • Identifies historical context of linguistic reorganization
  • References Nehru report 1928
  • Mentions specific language groups
  • Shows understanding of regional demands
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

Komal Punia

AIR 6

Subject & Paper

GS1GS1

Topic

Post-independence Consolidation and Reorganization within the country

Linguistic reorganization of states

Writing Stats

146

Total words

8

Paragraphs

Academic and analytical

Tone