PG

Prajnanandan Giri

Question 14.GS2GS1

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India signified a paradigm shift in the Judicial interpretation of the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration. In this context discuss the significance and impact of the judgement on cementing the federal structure.

Open scan (p.33)

Introduction

In SR Bommai v. Union of India case of 1992-93, Supreme Court held that Article 356 on President's rule provision should not be misused to topple opposition-ruled state government.

29 words

Main Body

Judicial Interpretation's significance :-

1. Brought the President's decision under Judicial Review.

2. On malafide intention the state assembly to be restored.

3. President's rule should only be implemented, when there is a Constitutional crisis and not on the ground of maladministration or Corruption.

— Prajnanandan Giri

44 words4 paragraphs
Answer continues on next page
  • Clear reference to landmark judgment
  • Explains significance of judicial review on presidential powers
  • Identifies key principles established
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

Prajnanandan Giri

Subject & Paper

GS2GS1

Topic

Post-independence Consolidation and Reorganization within the country

Federalism

Article 356 and State Autonomy

Writing Stats

73

Total words

4

Paragraphs

formal, analytical

Tone

Linked PYQ

Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set- back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer- related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation ? (b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case ? (c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why ?

20M2025Explain