S

Sachin

Question 7 - Final PartGS4GS1

4) Do you think it is ethically justified for a nation to prioritise security and economics over above special justice and social development priorities?

Open scan (p.36)

Main Body

4If it was within order in conjunction with environment ministry is not given, eg for whistleblowing. (A) National Interest refer to objectives, demands & interest that a nation as a whole strives to secure. Prioritising security & economics over social justice it's not justified because: i) the national identity exists only because of maintainance of social justice within. ii) Any travesty of social justice leads to instability & insurgency in the society. iii) It might lead to security & integrity issues. iv) Violating any individual right is human right itself. However, there might appear situations where security & economics might take precedence over social justice. (E6) During wartime - National energy prioritising.

— Sachin

113 words1 paragraphs
  • Provides clear definition of national interest
  • Presents multiple arguments against blanket prioritization of security over justice
  • Acknowledges complexity with contextual exceptions
  • Shows awareness of consequences (instability, insurgency)
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

Sachin

Subject & Paper

GS4GS1

Topic

Ethics and Political Philosophy

National Interest vs Social Justice

Prioritization of values in governance

Writing Stats

113

Total words

1

Paragraphs

analytical and argumentative

Tone