S

SALONI-VATSAIR 273· 2025

Question Q.13GS1GS1

While the Emergency of 1975 was touted as seminal for national security and unity by some, the critics paint it as the darkest phase of Post-independent India. Discuss. What insights and lessons did emergency provide for the country?

Open scan (p.29)

Main Body

From 1975 to 1977, India witnessed the emergency for a 21 month period.

Emergency as seminal for national security and unity:

> National security → political instability, naxalite violence, war with Pakistan (1971).

> Economic progress → Like rise in Industrial production and a decline in strikes.

> Social Discipline → The crackdown on corruption and anti-social elements brought a sense of order to the streets.

(c) The Naxalites' leaders assert weakened the violent communist movement for some areas.

short term economic gains might be attributed to the Emergency but long term neglected.

— SALONI-VATS · AIR 273

94 words2 paragraphs
Answer continues on next page
  • Balanced approach examining both positive and negative aspects
  • Multiple dimensions covered (security, economy, social)
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

SALONI-VATS

AIR 2732025

Subject & Paper

GS1GS1

Topic

Emergency 1975 and its implications

Political history post-independence

Emergency's impact on Indian democracy

Writing Stats

94

Total words

2

Paragraphs

Linked PYQ

Ajit has been recently promoted as the Head of the Department of Weapon Sales (DWS) in the Ministry of Defence Production (MDP). His charter of duties includes international sales of weapons produced domestically by MDP. In two recent wars, MDP weapons have performed admirably, resulting in many countries showing interest in buying them, particularly long-range artillery and missiles. Country A and country B have asked for these weapons. However, production constraints restrict DWS to accept only one purchase order. Country A is a developing nation with a sound technology base. MDP is planning R&D collaboration with it for the next generation of weapons. It is not part of any security alliance and needs weapons for protection from a troublesome neighbour. It seeks a large acquisition on a long-term loan. Country B is also a developing nation. Military strength is its priority, with the military budget often ingressing into allocations for human resources and infrastructure development. It is in security alliance with a superpower who has a large military base there and periodically allots it financial grants. It is a member of an economic bloc with which the government is currently negotiating a free trade agreement. It is not a signatory of NPT but possesses smaller nuclear weapons and delivery systems. It supports some guerrilla forces abroad. It has sought a smaller acquisition and is prepared to make some advance payment. It is currently negotiating arms purchases from another nation too. Ajit discussed this case with his counterparts in the related departments. Therein, the significant economic benefits, employment generation and stronger diplomatic relations arising from this sale were highlighted. It was also emphasized that refusing the deal could result in country B purchasing weapons from some other supplier. Ajit was aware that in arms sales, due diligence at each stage was pivotal to ensure conformity to national policy and international treaties. (a) Discuss the options available to Ajit. Which option should he select and why? (b) How can Ajit balance nation's economic and strategic interests with ethical considerations?

20M2026Discuss