Main Body
these occupying high echelons of power.
[Ignore the issue] Merit - It will not pose any personal threat to me.
Demerit - (1) It will go against the "highest public welfare".
(Merit) - (1) It will help in utilizing the internal accountability mechanism before going for any extreme step.
(Demerit) - (1) since corruption is systemic, it might not work. (2) May unnecessary delay the poor leading to continuance of corruption.
(Merit) - (1) It will bring public attention to grave injustice. (2) It might lead to crisis of conscience within me.
(Demerit) - (1) might cause personal inconvenience. (2) might bring dispute to the organization.
issue of corruption to me.
[Course of Action = will choose]
I will chuse 2nd and 3rd course of action in sequential manner. by I will first exhaust internal mechanisms then go for public disclosure.
=) Issue of corruption is severe challenge to Indian public Service delivery and it need attitude of zero tolerance to tackle it. Largest public welfare is cardinal virtue.
— Ankur Tripathi
Conclusion
27 words
- Presents multiple options systematically
- Analyzes merits and demerits
- Systematic comparison of options
- Recognizes systemic nature of corruption
- Clear course of action decided
- Connects to broader ethical framework
- Provides concluding statement
Ankur Tripathi
Executive, Judiciary, Ministries and Pressure Groups
Executive
Corruption and Ethical Governance
279
Total words
18
Paragraphs
formal
Tone