Main Body
Reasons for the abuse:
Article 280 omimages finance commission to look into horizontal and vertical devolution of laws.
Layout: ULRA, ULRB, ULRC → escrow
Neutral devolution (41/7):
(Consequentialist) - (income) of state
Burden of implementing CSS etc. considered.
Horizontal devolution:
income distance - 45/7
population - 15/7
area - 15/7
population control - 12.5/7
state efficieny - 2.5/7
Reserves raised by states:
Article 280 envisages the finance commission to look into horizontal and vertical devolution of laws.
Vertical devolution (41/7):
(Consequentialist) - (income) of state
Burden of implementing CSS etc. considered.
Horizontal devolution:
income distance - 45/7
population - 15/7
area - 15/7
population control - 12.5/7
state efficieny - 2.5/7
way of devolution:
↑ FC is constituted every 5 years
The constitutionalization of RTI has been a recurring demand raised by civil society like MAUSESS, Internet for freedom etc.
Steps required for constitutionalization:
Arguments in favour of constitutional status to CIC:
(B) Ensured autonomy for Gile making guiding by CIC to deal with grievous RTI
Arguments against constitutionalization:
However, a constitutional status, combined with political will, and civil society participation will best serve.
— BIPUL GUPTA · AIR 103
Conclusion
15 words
Diagram
Devolution structure showing Article 41/7 (vertical) decomposing into centre, GST, direct tax, and MP/UP/MH/CJ showing horizontal distribution to states
BIPUL GUPTA
Indian Constitution - Historical Underpinnings, Evolution, Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions and Basic Structure
Significant Provisions
Separation of Powers
503
Total words
38
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone