Comment on the utility and effectiveness of soft power for furthering national interest. Can soft power replace hard power in international politics?
Introduction
27 words
Main Body
Soft power is the use of culture, people-to-people relations, and similar tools in foreign policy, as opposed to military strength and economic strength, which constitute hard power.
Soft power is effective as:
Relations built on people-to-people connections last longer in global arena.
Soft power helps in promoting global image; Eg. bollywood globally, tollywood represent Indian values worldwide.
The recent rise of Korean-Drama has added to South Korea's soft power.
Promoting of Yoga, non-violence have helped in building India's image as world leader.
Vaccine diplomacy by India- This soft power helped India at health power discussion tables globally.
However, soft power cannot entirely replace the need for hard power, as:
Security of borders needs hard power.
Indellen's economic potential made US pull back sanctions on India after its nuclear tests.
India's role as net security provider in the region, and as a balancing power against China, needs hard power.
India should continue to focus on both methods. Soft power should be promoted to make the world more peaceful, without neglecting the need to develop hard power for at challenging times.
— GAURAV OJHA · AIR 204
Conclusion
31 words
Open original scan
Page 16
GAURAV OJHA
Effect of Policies of Developed/Developing Countries and Indian Diaspora
International Relations
Soft power and hard power in international relations
244
Total words
11
Paragraphs
formal and analytical
Tone