Question Q4Assess effectiveness and describe impactGS2GS2
Assess the effectiveness of Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 in resolution of river-water disputes. Also describe the potential impact of delays in resolution of water disputes.
Introduction
Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956 outlines procedure and appoints national to resolve inter-state rivers water disputes. Eg: Mahanadi Tribunal, Cauvery Tribunal.
22 words
Main Body
Analysis of Effectiveness:
Pros:
Obsoltion by Dialogue and conversation
Present debate in political environment, resolution outside sect jurisdiction without delay.
Cons:
Old rival tribunals have delivered awards
Fine decades to decide the award.
Studies not honouring the award informed.
Impact of delays in settlement:
1Livelihood: Drinking water (Zrngation) water to upstream states impacted.
2Politicization: Used by political leaders to draw votes during elections without evidence.
2Esteem of Trust: Trust in dispute attorneys ostilitie reduces which leads to dischrging culture.
4Economic: Federal Disputes and Economic Blocked: also debt investment in region.
5Regionalism: External regional sentiment in the population, clashes, riots etc.
State Tribunal (Upper) Time bound to Compulsory hearing of award to use Entire activities to resolve dispute.
— ADITYA HRIDAY UPADHYAY · AIR 154
127 words9 paragraphs
Conclusion
State Tribunal (Upper) Time bound to Compulsory hearing of award to use Entire activities to resolve dispute.
17 words
Examiner score
0.7/10Open original scan
Page 7
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Topper
ADITYA HRIDAY UPADHYAY
AIR 1542025
Subject & Paper
GS2GS2
Topic
Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances
Federalism
Inter-State River Water Disputes
Writing Stats
166
Total words
9
Paragraphs
analytical
Tone