Question Q.10(a) and (b)GS2GS2
The case study reflects how laws after impede delivery of public essential services and do complete justice.
Main Body
10a and 10b Options available to DM: (1) Do not engage ex-forest guards and local youth. increased impact → law is upheld for both → professional integrity maintained DEMERIT | MERIT ↔ law of life and property loss of life and → DEMERT | MERIT property expose incapacity of the DM → DEMERT
1Engage ex-forest guard and local youth. violation of government rules → forest fire controlled violation of government rules → prevent/limited damage of life/property may entail auxiliary action against DM → biodiversity is controlled (2) Book and initiation of insurance clearance by speaking to chief Secy, and meanwhile engage the people. chief secy may not call comply → forest fire controlled delays in insurance clearance → protect life and property protess life and property → professional integrity upheld C Here the DM should adopt the third option. Reasons: → fiduciary responsibility to protect life/property. → quick mobilization of resources → Overcome knower-doer split → guided by deontological ethics (go beyond call of duty) → Display of ethical altruism
— LIZA GARGA · AIR 303
171 words1 paragraphs
Answer continues on next page
Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Topper
LIZA GARGA
AIR 3032025
Subject & Paper
GS2GS2
Topic
Governance, Transparency, Accountability and E-governance
E-governance
Disaster Management and Public Service Delivery
Writing Stats
171
Total words
1
Paragraphs
formal analytical
Tone