a) What course of action should Marpi adopt and why? b) What should be the responsibilities of different segments and agencies to create positive social ambiance for accepting such changes?

This case explains how communitarian sentiments imply fraternity and progressive outcomes. a Ethical issues involved in the care: (1) Culturally induced selective blindness of parents towards other communities. (2) Some of right to elementary education (Art 21-A) of children (3) Issue of communal hatred (social fractures) (4) Livelihood of teaching staff who now fear withdrawal (5) Media trial and yellow journalism b Course of action by Marpi: (1) Meet Sarpanch and well for a gram sabha meeting (kollegality participated) (2) Persuasion of parents (Cildini's influence weapons) to sensitize them about communal harmony and RJTE Act 2002 (3) Use social media to spread message of communal peace (4) Negotiate with pressure groups to practice ethical altruism instead of ethical amnesia → Ask them to spread awareness and curb misinformation.

b Continued - Course of action by Marpi: (5) Organize meeting of parents and school to emphasize that headmistress actions are correct (image correction). Reasons for this course of action: (1) Upheld spirit of preamble justice, state equality liberty (2) Uphold virtue ethics Secularist (3) Uphold Kantian ethic (4) Awesome knows-doer split (5) Uphold Sita Sharma samishava (ethical individualism)

Responsibilities of different social segments: (1) Practice ethical discourse (2) Judge in ethical universalism (3) Foster social harmony (social ethics of durkheim) (4) Treat humanity as means (categorical imperative of Kant) (5) Practice enlightened engagement to required wider interface Thus social pressure groups should indulge in gradual social engineering to foster social capital and foster human capital and social cohesion formation.

— LIZA GARGA · AIR 303