India has adopted the integrated judicial system with Supreme Court at the helm and HC & SC Subordinate courts at record stages. Whereas, USA has independent judiciary for Centre & State - Federalism & Judiciery.
35 words
Main Body
India vs USA Judicial System Comparison: India: SC, HC, Subordinate courts (integrated hierarchy) USA: Centre Supreme Court with separate judiciary (separate judiciery for each state) Benefit of federal Judiciary in India: Protecting the interest of states, reduce the uniformity structure, judiciary independence to the states, will become harder to undermine unity integrity or the nation, cooperative federalism.
Benefits of federal judiciary: Protecting the interest of states, reduce the uniformity structure, judiciary independence to the states, will become harder to undermine unity integrity of the nation, cooperative federalism Challenge of federal judiciary in India: Being a culturally & socially diverse country, it will be difficult to have separate courts for each state, will become harder to undermine unity integrity of the nation, cooperative federalism Way forward: Rather than having a dedicated federal judicial system, India should have a participative judiciary to accomodate the views of states.
— SHIVAM SINGH · AIR 73
145 words1 paragraphs
Conclusion
Should India move towards more federal judicial system: Rather than having a dedicated federal judicial system, India should have a participative judiciary to accommodate the views of States.
28 words
Diagram
Comparison chart showing India's integrated judicial system vs USA's federal judicial system with hierarchical structure