Critically examine the 'in-house procedure' adopted by the Apex Court to inquire into allegations of misconduct against judges of constitutional courts in India.

S.C. recently adjudicated an in-house procedure for Justice Valumant urina in each case. Positive of in-house procedure: 1) An inter with independence of judiciary, Partly, devoted. 2) Ensures separation of powers from political use of agencies. 3) Consistent with S.C. ruling in Veersawami case: plurally in plurality. Cadwallader by 2nd judges)

In wake of reported 'white judge syndrome' Favouritism in courts, pure are beginning questions over such exclusive state: Violates, distributive dating. Latterly solving paralleled process controlled Paralleled powers to impeach judges. Way forward: 1) Have transparency with whistles reasonly made available in public domain. 2) Government say to use a 'Yam' committee member children. Since judiciary has been accorded ghat powers, its actions to procedure and in democratic spirit to court constitutional morality.

— UTKARSH MISHRA · AIR 337