AS

Abhishek Singh· 2023

Question Q13GS2GS2

S.R. Bommai V. UoT - Signified a parallel shift in judicial interpretation of Union's authority to assume control of State's administrations. In this context discuss the significance & impact of the judgement on cementing the federal structure.

Open scan (p.32)

Main Body

S.R. Bommai Judgement of 1994 is a landmark case which strengthened Indian federalism. Significance: (1) Judicial review: President's power to impose president rule is subject to judicial review. (2) Relevant material: President to use 'relevant material' to justify imposition of Article 356. (3) Federalism: was declared as basic structure.

4Floor of the house: should be used by governor to test the majority of government. (5) President can dismiss state government only when both house approves it & then just suspend. (6) Case of (Proper & Improper) use of Article 356: Guidelines issued by SC to governors. for eg: Proper use: when hung assembly or Malaluja in state & governor or Corruption, can't find any difficult financial position of state etc. | Improper use: or Corruption, can't find any difficult financial position of state etc. Impact of Judgement: Positive: Uphold Constitutionalism Limited government, Rule of law, Saving federal Spirit, Bring more stability to state government. | Negative:

Positive impact: ( → ) Upholds Constitutionalism Limited government, Rule of law, Saving federal Spirit, Bring more stability to state government. Negative impact: ( → ) PSC judgments are ignored by Centre. eg., maharashtra → No testing majority on floor house. Curt. ( → ) Governor's day to day interference in state's governance. for eg., P.N. Rai' in Tamil Nadu, Delhi' L.G etc. Way forward → maintain balance of power 'Punchh Committee' fixed tenure for Governor → 2nd ARC making Governor independent use A 356 in 'bare case' status. Bommai case is significant but more Political recourse from Union for true federalism.

— Abhishek Singh

253 words1 paragraphs

Conclusion

Bommai case is significant but more Political recourse from Union for true federalism.

13 words

Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

Abhishek Singh

2023Polity

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances

Federalism

S.R. Bommai Case

Writing Stats

266

Total words

1

Paragraphs

Linked PYQ

Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set- back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer- related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation ? (b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case ? (c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why ?

20M2025Explain