R

RUHANIAIR 5· 2023

Question Q.14GS2GS2

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India signified a paradigm shift in the judicial interpretation of the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration. In this context discuss the significance and impact of the judgement on cementing the federal structure.

Open scan (p.33)

Introduction

S.R. Bommai case, 1994 laid a strong foundation for federalism in the country.

13 words

Main Body

Article 356 i.e. President's rule cannot be issued arbitrarily by the government. The President's satisfaction is subject to judicial review. SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDGEMENT In case of hung assembly, Article 356 can be used only if the situation is grave and is beyond correction by the state government. In case of hung assembly, the Article 356 can be issued. Governor must conduct a floor test before a new government is formed.

Prevented misuse of Article 356 [Diagram showing 'Impact of Judgement' with branches:] - Governors get the framework for floor test - Ensured stability of state government - Strengthened cooperative federalism Thus, S.R. Bommai judgement played a significant role in limiting the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration.

— RUHANI · AIR 5

120 words1 paragraphs

Conclusion

Thus, S.R. Bommai judgement played a significant role in limiting the union's authority to assume control of a state's administration.

20 words

Diagram

Flow chart showing Impact of Judgement with three branches: governors' framework for floor test, state government stability, and strengthened cooperative federalism

Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

RUHANI

AIR 52023

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Federal Structure - Functions, Responsibilities, Devolution of Powers and Finances

Federalism

S.R. Bommai Case and Federal Structure

Writing Stats

153

Total words

1

Paragraphs

analytical

Tone

Linked PYQ

Rajesh is a Group A officer with nine years of service. He is posted as Administrative Officer in an Oil Public Sector undertaking. As an Administrative Officer he is responsible for managing and coordinating various administrative tasks to ensure smooth functioning of office. He also manages office supplies, equipment etc. Rajesh is now sufficient senior and is expecting his next promotion in JAG (Junior Administrative Grade) in the next one or two years. He knows that promotion is based on examination of ACRs/Performance Appraisal of last few years (5 years or so) of an officer by a DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) and an officer lacking requisite grading of ACRs may not be found fit for promotion. Consequences of losing promotion may entail financial and reputational loss and set- back for career progression. Though he also puts his best efforts in official discharge of his duties, yet he is unsure of assessment by his superior officer. He is now putting extra efforts so that he gets thumping report at the end of financial year. As Administrative Officer, Rajesh is regularly interacting with his immediate boss, who is his reporting officer for writing his ACR. One day he calls Rajesh and wants him to buy computer- related stationery on priority from a particular vendor. Rajesh instructs his office to initiate action for procuring these items. During the day, the dealing Assistant brings an estimate of Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs covering all stationery items from the same vendor. It is noticed that as per delegated financial powers, as provided in the GFR (General Financial Rules) as applicable in that Organisation, expenditure for office items exceeding Rupees Thirty Lakhs requires sanction of the next higher authority (boss in the present case). Rajesh knows that immediate superior would expect all these purchases should be done at his level and may not appreciate such lack of initiative on his part. During discussions with office, he learns that common practice of splitting of expenditure (where large order is divided into a series of smaller ones) is followed to avoid obtaining sanction from higher authority. This practice is against the rules and may come to the adverse notice of Audit. Rajesh is perturbed. He is unsure of taking decision in the matter. (a) What are the options available with Rajesh in the above situation ? (b) What are the ethical issues involved in this case ? (c) Which would be the most appropriate option for Rajesh and why ?

20M2025Explain