SS

SURAMYA SHARMAAIR 359· 2025

Question Q.19GS2GS2

Even as India experiences consistent economic growth and has achieved self-sufficiency in food production, hunger and food insecurity remain pressing concerns. Examine the factors responsible for this paradox and suggest steps to improve the situation.

Open scan (p.38)

Introduction

The paradox of consistent economic growth but high poverty and hunger is highlighted in Desai Enigma.

16 words

Main Body

The paradox of consistent economic growth but high poverty and hunger is highlighted in Desai Enigma. Nutri puzzle theories by Angus Deaton. India's experience: Economic growth 6-8% consistent since 1990s. Rise in per capita income and poverty reduction from 1991 (World Bank Report). Global Hunger Index ranks India (105/124 with various categories). Factors for the paradox: Accessibility issue of food NE → poor infrastructure-seed, etc. Storage in infrastructure shortage: production is 350 MT, storage 1.45-150 MT. Food consumption habits in India: eg. low protein diet and high carbohydrate caloric diet → deficiencies. Gender inequities → predominate of woman health & nutrition. Child health affected → low nutrient acquisition, eg. 4-35% stunting. Lack of field storage infrastructure → losses of fruits, vegetables, eg. Farm gate loss 9,000 crore. Steps to improve: Development of storage infrastructure, eg. hub & spoke model led.

Storage infrastructure shortage: production is 350 MT, storage 1.45-150 MT. Food consumption habits in India: eg. low protein diet and high carbohydrate caloric diet → deficiencies. Gender inequities → predominate of woman health & nutrition, eg. 59% women anemic. Child health affected → low nutrient acquisition, eg. 4-35% stunting. Lack of field storage infrastructure → losses of fruits, vegetables, eg. Farm gate loss 9,000 crore. Steps to improve: Development of storage infrastructure, eg. hub & spoke model led. PDS expansion + Fair price shops. Social audits of PDS system → identify short beneficiaries+ revoke exclusion/inclusion issues. Auditing PDS to bottom 40% of population (most poor) (Economic Survey 2020). Food fortification (vitamin & rice) → Headlma committee recommendation. Registral PDS and PRM system (Shanta Kumar committee). Make Food Marshkalles in tier 2/3 cities. Steps in this direction would ensure commitment to SDG 1 and SDG 2.

— SURAMYA SHARMA · AIR 359

285 words1 paragraphs

Conclusion

Steps in this direction would ensure commitment to SDG 1 and SDG 2.

13 words

Diagram

Global Hunger Index ranks India (105/124) with various categories shown in a box

Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

SURAMYA SHARMA

AIR 3592025

Subject & Paper

GS2GS2

Topic

Issues relating to Poverty and Hunger

Paradox of Poverty

Food Security and Hunger despite Economic Growth

Writing Stats

314

Total words

1

Paragraphs

analytical

Tone

Linked PYQ

There is a technological company named ABC Incorporated which is the second largest worldwide, situated in the Third World. You are the Chief Executive Officer and the majority shareholder of this company. The fast technological improvements have raised worries among environmental activists, regulatory authorities, and the general public over the sustainability of this scenario. You confront substantial issues about the business’s environmental footprint. In 2023, your organization had a significant increase of 48% in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the levels recorded in 2019. The significant rise in energy consumption is mainly due to the surging energy requirements of your data centers, fuelled by the exponential expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI-powered services need much more computational resources and electrical energy compared to conventional online activities, notwithstanding their notable gains. The technology’s proliferation has led to a growing concern over the environmental repercussions, resulting in an increase in warnings. AI models, especially those used in extensive machine learning and data processing, exhibit much greater energy consumption than conventional computer tasks, with an exponential increase. Although there is already a commitment and goal to achieve net zero emissions by 2030, the challenge of lowering emissions seems overwhelming as the integration of AI continues to increase. To achieve this goal, substantial investments in renewable energy use would be necessary. The difficulty is exacerbated by the competitive environment of the technology sector, where rapid innovation is essential for preserving market standing and shareholders’ worth. To achieve a balance between innovation, profitability and sustainability, a strategic move is necessary that is in line with both, business objectives and ethical obligations. (a) What is your immediate response to the challenges posed in the above case? (b) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the above case. (c) Your company has been identified to be penalized by technological giants. What logical and ethical arguments will you put forth convince about its necessity? (d) Being a conscience being, what measures would you adopt to maintain balance between AI innovation and environment footprint?

20M2024Discuss