SB

Sayali Bhika PagarAIR 87· 2023

Question 19GS3GS3

There is a lack of significant improvement in the quality of river water in India despite multiple efforts by different stakeholders. Elaborate with examples.

Open scan (p.58)

Main Body

According to CPCB's latest report, 351 miles stretches were identified on 323 rivers. Based on results of biochemical oxygen demand BOD which leads to notification of organic pollution. Main cause of water pollution is release of untreated sewage water directly into rivers. This is a result of rapid growing urbanisation, industrialisation, lack of monitoring, lack of adherence to guidelines for use of fertilizers in agriculture. Various schemes launched by Government of India are as follows: 1) Namami Gange Programme: A central sector scheme which aims to prevent pollution, conservation of river Ganga. 2) National Rivers Conservation Programme: Centrally sponsored scheme - to reduce pollution load in rivers through implementation of various pollution abatement works. 3) Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act -1974: This act led to setting up of central pollution control board at national level & State Pollution Control boards at states.

Recent amendments have devastated many violating is set penalties at ₹10,000 - ₹15 lakh. Penalties imposed on head of department if any violation of guidelines. 4) National Water Monitoring Programme: Under this programs → continuous assessment of water quality, setting up of monitoring network across various locations, spread across 28 APTS & 9 UTE. 5) National Water Policy 2012: Conservation of water bodies by ensuring industrial effluents, residues of fertilizers do not reach the rivers. Despite these measures, there is lack of significant improvement in the water quality of rivers. This can be attributed to following reasons: 1) Lack of funding: Various schemes, the funds allocated got released very late or are not used efficiently. 2) Lack of monitoring: Lack of technology, infrastructure, dedicated institution for monitoring water quality at various levels (ensure the family information regarding quality of water). 3) Low capacity: The current capacity of sewage treatment plants

is inadequate to tackle the enormous sewage generated in various metropolitan cities. Only about 40% of water/sewage is treated & rest is released untreated, due to capacity & led in released untreated, due to lack of sewage treatment plants. 4) Quality of sewage treatment plant: Ensuring that the quality of water released past treatment is suitable to be released. 5) Agricultural runoffs: Excessive use of fertilizers in water bodies without acknowledging the capacity of soil has led to soil degradation of justices seen off to rivers leads to eutrophication harming the aquatic organism. 6) Riverside pollution: especially at popular religious places - release of garbage into rivers has led to pollution. In India's scenario, one of the water-stressed country largest agrarian population, gives are the life line of the country. Thus ensuring quality of water in the river is of utmost importance. Amendment in water quality promoting WASH (water, sanitation, hygiene) outreach the heights repeated hearing would encourage the investment.

— Sayali Bhika Pagar · AIR 87

454 words1 paragraphs

Conclusion

Thus ensuring quality of water in the river is of utmost importance. Amendment in water quality promoting WASH (water, sanitation, hygiene) outreach the heights repeated hearing would encourage the investment.

30 words

Steal this copy's techniques PremiumAI pulls out the reusable moves — pick the ones you want as flashcards
Compare my answer PremiumSee where this topper beats you

Topper

Sayali Bhika Pagar

AIR 872023

Subject & Paper

GS3GS3

Topic

Biodiversity and Environment

Environmental Pollution & Degradation

Environmental Pollution & Degradation

Writing Stats

484

Total words

1

Paragraphs

analytical

Tone

Linked PYQ

You are a municipal commissioner of a large city, having the reputation of a very honest and upright officer. A huge multipurpose mall is under construction in your city in which a large number of daily wage earners are employed. One night, during monsoons, a big chunk of the roof collapsed causing instant death of four labourers including two minors. Many more were seriously injured requiring immediate medical attention. The mishap resulted in a big hue and cry, forcing the government to institute an enquiry. Your preliminary enquiry has revealed a series of anomalies. The material used for the construction was of poor quality. Despite the approved building plans permitting only one basement, an additional basement has been constructed. This was overlooked during the periodic inspections by the building inspector of. The municipal corporation. In your enquiry, you noticed that the construction of the mall was given the green signal despite encroaching on areas earmarked for a green belt and a slip road in the Zonal Master Plan of the city. The permission to construct the mall was accorded by the previous Municipal Commissioner who is not only your senior and well known to you professionally, but also a good friend. Prima facie, the case appears to be of a widespread nexus between officials of the Municipal Corporation and the builders. Your colleagues are putting pressure on you to go slow in the enquiry. The builder, who is rich and influential, happens to be a close relative of a powerful minister in the state cabinet. The builder is persuading you to hush up the matter, promising you a fortune to do so. He also hinted that this matter is not resolved at the earliest in his favour there is somebody in his office who is waiting to file a case against you under the POSH Act. Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. What are the options available to you in this situation? Explain your selected course of action.

20M2020Discuss